Public opinion cannot be translated into representation without filters. Distance is required, and this applies to both royal representation (the "two bodies of the king") and democratic-republican representation. Political representation cannot be reduced to a mere relationship between representatives and the represented. A democratically organized community, in particular, cannot do without symbolic means and mediation.
The current trend towards direct democracy, particularly facilitated by new communication media, is bringing this classic debate in political thought back on the agenda. On this basis, it becomes possible to address in particular the phenomenon that is currently putting the self-image of liberal democracies under pressure: radicalism. Radicalism knows no distance. In radicalism, differences, nuances, and detours lose their relevance. Radical tendencies emerge in politics, society and culture when distances are eliminated and immediacy replaces mediation.
It is these considerations that Plessner developed in his book "The Limits of Community". The book will celebrate its centenary in 2024. It is by no means outdated. In fact, quite the opposite is true, as current trends towards radicalisation in politics (identity), science (activism) or culture (empathy) demonstrate. This trend is further accentuated by new technologies which, by extending beyond their communication function, challenge the foundations of democratic communities.