Inter-University Centre Dubrovnik

An independent international centre for advanced studies

Law, Economics, Politics and Governance Law, Economics, Politics and Governance

48 | PUBLIC AND PRIVATE JUSTICE

Judicial Precedents: Uniformity and Pluralism
Duration
27 May 2024 - 31 May 2024
Language
English
Status
REGULAR
ECTS points
Yes
Course directors :
Alan Uzelac , University of Zagreb, Croatia
Stefaan Voet , KU Leuven, Belgium
Course description:

The primary function of courts is to adjudicate, applying the law to the facts established in the judicial process. However, the question arises: can judges also contribute to the creation of law? Traditionally, the doctrinal distinction between common law and civil law countries often centered on their stance toward judge-made law. While judicial precedents were historically regarded as a fundamental characteristic of common law judiciaries, civil law systems strictly adhered to a separation of powers, conferring the authority to issue binding abstract rules solely upon the legislator.

In the 21st century, a pervasive transformation of global justice systems has led to the questioning and gradual abandonment of these old dogmas. In pursuit of uniformity and efficiency, both European continental judicial systems and Latin American judiciaries have adopted practices seemingly converging with the Anglo-American doctrine of stare decisis. This involves recognizing judicial decisions that establish a binding interpretation of the law, and in some cases, even create new legal rules.

However, this evolving trend introduces numerous challenges that must be addressed. The structures and social purposes of European judiciaries differ, and the adoption of new 'precedents' may lead to frictions and tensions. Considering the hierarchical nature of civil law justice systems, binding rulings from higher courts pose a potential threat to substantive judicial independence, limiting the open and pluralistic dialogue between lower and higher courts. Additionally, binding opinions from the highest judicial instances may encroach upon the prerogatives of legislative bodies, resulting in the creation of suboptimal laws.

Against this backdrop, the XVIII Public and Private Justice course and conference will focus on unresolved issues, offering detailed comparisons of judicial precedents and similar mechanisms in various jurisdictions within and outside Europe.

Those interested in participating in our course or contributing a presentation on these issues are welcome to contact us at ppj.dubrovnik@gmail.com. The draft program for the 2024 PPJ Course and Conference will be published in due course at http://alanuzelac.from.hr/text/iuc-course."

Course lecturers:
Christian Delgado , Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Peru
Biljana Đuričin , University of Montenegro, Montenegro
Francesca Ferrari , University of Insubria, Italy
Aleš Galič , University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Ramón García Odgers , Catholic University of the Most Immaculate Conception, Chile, Chile
Ewelina Gee-Milan , Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland
Viktória Harsági , Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary
Albert Henke , University of Milan, Italy
Marek Ivančo , Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
Bart Krans , University of Leiden, Netherlands
Alexandra Löwy , Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
Richard Marcus , University of California, San Francisco, United States
João Marques Martins , University of Lisbon, Portugal
Paul McKeown , Northumbria University, United Kingdom
Luca Passanante , University of Brescia, Italy
Marta Requejo Isidro , Court of Justice of the EU, Luxembourg
Piotr Rylski , University of Warsaw, Poland
Julius Schumann , University of Vienna, Austria
Jorg Sladič , University of Maribor, Slovenia
Verica Trstenjak , Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Austria
Alan Uzelac , University of Zagreb, Croatia
Stefaan Voet , KU Leuven, Belgium
Branka Babović Vuksanović , University of Belgrade, Serbia
Hermes Zaneti , Espirito Santo University, Brazil
Tatjana Zoroska-Kamilovska , Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
Attached documents
PPJ_2024_programme_draft_5.doc